James Zahnd
Justice
of the Peace
Saline
County District 13
21
Sergio Way – Hot Springs Village, AR 71909
Telephone:
501 / 701-3738
June, 4,
2013
Dear Friends &
Neighbors,
A
good crowd of local residents turned out May 21
when the Saline County Quorum Court held its monthly meeting in Hot Springs
Village. Normally, the Court meets at the Saline County Court House in Benton,
but the May and June meetings this year are being held at other sites -- the
Village and East End -- in order to make the Court’s proceedings more accessible
to citizens living considerable distances from the seat of our county
government.
It was the first time in
four years the Court has met here, and local residents demonstrated their
appreciation and commitment to effective local government by attending the
meeting.
One
of the key pieces of business considered by the Court at its
meeting here was an ordinance to reimburse jurors for the miles they drive to
and from jury duty. I was the lead sponsor of that ordinance and pleased that it
passed unanimously.
Prior to the ordinance’s
passage, those reporting for jury duty received a per diem of $25 a day, and
those actually serving on a jury received $50 a day. However, for
jurors living here and in other distant parts of the County, much of the per
diem was consumed by the cost of travel. Now, jurors will receive
42 cents per mile driven to cover their automobile expense, in addition to their
per diem.
The
cost of operating Saline County Detention Center in
Benton is becoming an increasing concern for the Quorum Court.
While the Detention Center is one of the most effective and efficiently
operated facilities of its kind in Arkansas, spiraling occupancy and increasing
costs are making adequate funding a challenge. The 2013 county
general budget contains $1.3 million in supplemental funding for jail operations
as well as other funding amounting to $1.4 million.
The seven-year-old
Detention Center has the capacity to hold 180 prisoners. Last year, it recorded
6,207 bookings and 49,923 days of incarceration. Both figures represent
increases of more than 10% in little more than five years.
Recently, jail officials
have surfaced some creative approaches for easing the financial burden of caring
for prisoners. Last month, for example, the Quorum Court passed an
ordinance requiring inmates to pay a $20 co-pay for any prisoner-initiated
medical services they receive, and a $10 co-pay for all doctor prescribed
prescriptions not covered by the inmates’ insurance. A related proposal yet to
come before the Court would charge prisoners for the cost of their incarceration
and for transportation to and from their court appearances.
While officials candidly
acknowledge that such actions are not likely to provide major revenue for jail
operations, they believe they do begin to shift the financial burden of
incarceration from the County’s law-abiding taxpayers to the criminals. What do
you think? If you have an opinion on this, I’d like to hear
it.
If
you have friends or neighbors who would be interested in having the
information in my newsletters, please feel free to forward them to your personal
email lists. Until next
time………..JZ
No comments:
Post a Comment